Image credit: Source: Spillemyndigheden and Danish trade press coverage. Never imply stock depicts the actual event.
Denmark's Gambling Authority, Spillemyndigheden, began enforcing a DNS block on 98 unlicensed gambling websites from August 18, 2026, including the US prediction market platform Polymarket, after a Frederiksberg Court order dated July 8. Danish telecom providers, coordinated through the trade body Teleindustrien, now refuse standard DNS resolution to all 98 domains. Trade press including GamblingNews.com, Gaming Intelligence and the Copenhagen Post confirmed the block was live through August 21.
The number that matters for the wider picture: this brings Denmark's cumulative count of blocked illegal gambling domains since 2012 to 870. Polymarket is the highest-profile name on this particular list, the first time a major US prediction market has been named in a Danish block order.
What changes for a Danish bettor today
If you try to open Polymarket or any of the other 97 sites through a normal Danish internet connection, the domain will not resolve. That is what a DNS block does: it does not touch the site itself, it stops your provider's directory service from pointing your browser there.
A VPN or an alternate DNS provider still gets you through. But every one of these 98 sites remains unlicensed under Danish law regardless of how you reach it, so routing around the block does not change your legal or consumer-protection position. You are still betting on a platform Denmark has ruled illegal to operate there.
Spillemyndigheden and the court order said the targeted operators had gone out of their way to court Danish punters specifically: Danish-language interfaces, DKK pricing, Danish flags and national symbols on the sites, and native-language customer support and payment methods. That targeting, not just unlicensed status generally, is part of why this batch drew a court order rather than a routine addition to the blacklist.
Why Polymarket specifically drew scrutiny
The action followed integrity complaints Danish authorities cited directly. According to official statements, roughly 150 users wagered about 5.3 million DKK on a Polymarket-style contract in the hours before a US strike on Iran, a bet on the timing of a real conflict event rather than its outcome. Separately, authorities said a US special-forces soldier was arrested after profiting 2.6 million DKK on a Venezuela-related prediction contract, a case that raises the same insider-information concern regulators have long policed in sports betting.
Neither allegation has been tested in a Danish court against Polymarket itself, and the company disputes the framing of the ruling generally. But the two cases are what moved war-and-conflict betting from a philosophical objection into a regulatory action with a court order behind it.
Tax and Growth Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt did not hedge on the moral argument. "People lose their lives. Families lose loved ones. Wars destroy entire societies. And someone says, 'What if we could bet on when that happens?' That's completely insane," he told DR.dk.
Former Tax Minister Ane Halsboe-Jorgensen, who pushed for the crackdown starting in December 2025, made the same point more plainly to TV 2: "It is extremely inappropriate to turn something serious into a betting question."
Not every Danish politician agrees the block was proportionate. Liberal Alliance spokesperson Steffen Frolund pushed back publicly, comparing Polymarket-style event contracts to insurance-style speculation and arguing Denmark is being too cautious toward a genuinely new financial product, according to DR.dk. That disagreement is on the record inside Danish politics, not just from the company being blocked.
Polymarket itself called its platform "an important innovation within the digital financial market" and said it was disappointed by the ruling. The company told DR.dk it holds no market position and profits from no particular outcome on its contracts, and confirmed it intends to challenge the block in Danish courts.
The block is not necessarily the final word
That court challenge matters for any bettor tracking this story. Denmark's regulator has enforcement machinery that already runs to 870 blocked domains over 14 years, but Polymarket is contesting this specific ruling, and a reversal or narrowing on appeal is possible. Nothing here is settled the way, say, a licence revocation with no appeal pending would be.
For now, the practical answer is simple. Any Danish bettor who wants to use Polymarket has to leave the regulated, filtered path Denmark has built to do it, and every one of the 98 sites on this list carries the same unlicensed status whether or not the DNS block happens to be the thing stopping you that day.
Related: The UK Gambling Commission's Illegal Market Disruption Strategy | The CFTC Wants Prediction Markets to Stop Looking Like Betting Odds | Kalshi Faces an Illinois Prediction Market Lawsuit